Lately, I’ve been reminded that the judgment leveraged at a lot of people at Reed for personal discomfort with polyamory is a major pet peeve of mine.
This might seem odd hot on the heels of my ‘casual sex is okay!’ post, but I feel the need to explain myself. I don’t care if people want to be polyamorous. I may try it someday, though I so rarely find someone I want to be romantic with, I can’t imagine finding multiple people at once, let alone having it work. I also have certain triggers wrt being compared to other people/fear of not measuring up, so at a certain level of involvement, I’m guessing it wouldn’t be good for me. But, it definitely works for some people, and I think it’s an option everyone should feel comfortable exploring if they so desire.
No, what upsets me is the expectation that anyone truly free and loving will be comfortable with polyamory, and if someone is uncomfortable with a partner fooling around with other people, then they’re automatically clingy and controlling.
Maybe if we were all completely rational about love, we would all be polyamorous. The problem is, love is about emotional needs, which are inherently kind of irrational. More troubling, I see lots of codependent relationships where one partner isprofoundlyuncomfortable with the idea of an open relationship, but will also bend over backwards to avoid asserting their own needs, because it’s the only way to hold onto their partner. I’ve reached the point where when I see a monogamous relationship open up, I see it as a warning sign, and I wish I were wrong more than I am.
I suppose my main point is, people should be up front with themselves AND their partners about their needs. Sometimes sacrifices are worth it, sometimes they aren’t. But I just can’t see polyamory as a universal solution, right for everyone who just happens to be well-adjusted enough. If we are all expected to express freedom in the same ways, it isn’t freedom anymore.